<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trials and Tribulations of a Word 2007 User</title>
	<atom:link href="http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/</link>
	<description>Damien Fitzpatrick's blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/comment-page-1/#comment-17904</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/#comment-17904</guid>
		<description>I use Office Suite perfessionally and have for years now. I am/was able to formate any type of doc fancy or simple and got to know the tool well, setting up macros mail merges etc. 

There are many new templates that I like however the basics are all messed up!  I can&#039;t find anything and it is very hard to fix so I can. 
Bad move Microsoft - why didn&#039;t you ask professional users before making such a mess out of well known/oved ribbon format</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Office Suite perfessionally and have for years now. I am/was able to formate any type of doc fancy or simple and got to know the tool well, setting up macros mail merges etc. </p>
<p>There are many new templates that I like however the basics are all messed up!  I can&#8217;t find anything and it is very hard to fix so I can.<br />
Bad move Microsoft &#8211; why didn&#8217;t you ask professional users before making such a mess out of well known/oved ribbon format</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glynes</title>
		<link>http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/comment-page-1/#comment-8684</link>
		<dc:creator>Glynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/#comment-8684</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s one thing I like in Word 2007 ... the slide bar to adjust the document view-zoom.  I&#039;ll use that a lot.  Even if it is stuck clear at the bottom right, about as far as it can get from any other functional items.

If you find a way to &#039;reorder&#039; the ribbons, please share it!!  I spent my first 3 hours on Word trying to do just that, because each tab contains 75% things I never use.  If I can&#039;t delete items I don&#039;t need, I&#039;d at least like to sort them so the ones I want aren&#039;t mixed up in the mess.  The only option I&#039;ve found so far is a $30 add-on program.  (Appears that the ribbons are rather like the sidebar in Outlook ... Microsoft has decided what I&#039;ll use and how I&#039;ll use it ... whether it&#039;s what I actually need or not.)  I finally resorted to minimizing the whole ribbon mess and customizing the quick toolbar to include the things I use most.  I&#039;m happy to be back to one-click editing and formatting, instead of 2007&#039;s three-clicks-and-then-search technique.  (Not to be put off, however, whenever I highlight anything to edit, Word cleverly pops up a little window with the tab/ ribbon it thinks I need ... 4 out of 5 times so far:  wrong choice!).  There are probably ways to customize things more, but if so, they&#039;re as cleverly hidden as the double-underline function!

As someone who&#039;s typed and word-processed for a living for over 40 years, this version hasn&#039;t shown me anything special, and a whole lot that doesn&#039;t work.  Microsoft has a dynamite marketing team, to make this stuff industry standard; I wish the functionality of their software was half as good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s one thing I like in Word 2007 &#8230; the slide bar to adjust the document view-zoom.  I&#8217;ll use that a lot.  Even if it is stuck clear at the bottom right, about as far as it can get from any other functional items.</p>
<p>If you find a way to &#8216;reorder&#8217; the ribbons, please share it!!  I spent my first 3 hours on Word trying to do just that, because each tab contains 75% things I never use.  If I can&#8217;t delete items I don&#8217;t need, I&#8217;d at least like to sort them so the ones I want aren&#8217;t mixed up in the mess.  The only option I&#8217;ve found so far is a $30 add-on program.  (Appears that the ribbons are rather like the sidebar in Outlook &#8230; Microsoft has decided what I&#8217;ll use and how I&#8217;ll use it &#8230; whether it&#8217;s what I actually need or not.)  I finally resorted to minimizing the whole ribbon mess and customizing the quick toolbar to include the things I use most.  I&#8217;m happy to be back to one-click editing and formatting, instead of 2007&#8217;s three-clicks-and-then-search technique.  (Not to be put off, however, whenever I highlight anything to edit, Word cleverly pops up a little window with the tab/ ribbon it thinks I need &#8230; 4 out of 5 times so far:  wrong choice!).  There are probably ways to customize things more, but if so, they&#8217;re as cleverly hidden as the double-underline function!</p>
<p>As someone who&#8217;s typed and word-processed for a living for over 40 years, this version hasn&#8217;t shown me anything special, and a whole lot that doesn&#8217;t work.  Microsoft has a dynamite marketing team, to make this stuff industry standard; I wish the functionality of their software was half as good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason,

I&#039;ve added a sample document to the article.  Unfortunately, it&#039;s fairly plain, but hopefully it will give you some idea.  For what I do at least - which is writing reports and assignments - Word 2007 has certainly helped me create better presentation and layout much more easily.

Damien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve added a sample document to the article.  Unfortunately, it&#8217;s fairly plain, but hopefully it will give you some idea.  For what I do at least &#8211; which is writing reports and assignments &#8211; Word 2007 has certainly helped me create better presentation and layout much more easily.</p>
<p>Damien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people.ephox.com/damien/2007/02/26/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-a-word-2007-user/#comment-878</guid>
		<description>Hey, have you got any pictures of fancy looking word docs. I use word 2003 to write guitar lessons but want to improve the layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, have you got any pictures of fancy looking word docs. I use word 2003 to write guitar lessons but want to improve the layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
